GE CHINA TECHNOLOGY CENTER: EVOLVING ROLE IN GLOBAL INNOVATION
Haiyang Li and Rebecca Chung wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality.
This publication may not be transmitted, photocopied, digitized or otherwise reproduced in any form or by any means without the permission of the copyright holder. Reproduction of this material is not covered under authorization by any reproduction rights organization. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, contact Ivey Publishing, Ivey Business School, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 0N1; (t) 519.661.3208; (e) email@example.com; www.iveycases.com .
In mid-2014, Dr. Xiangli Chen, general manager of the General Electric (GE) China Technology Center (CTC), and chief technology officer and vice president of GE China, had just been promoted to GE officer status and was thinking about the next stage of the CTC.
Located in Shanghai, the CTC was formed in 2000 to work with GE’s other research and development (R&D) centers so that it could bring technology breakthroughs and product innovations to the market. It was not only one of the biggest foreign-invested R&D centers in China, but also one of the few enterprise R&D centers with fundamental research capabilities and activities in the country. With its “In China for China” (ICFC) strategy that was initiated in 2008, the CTC specifically launched new projects for the Chinese market, rather than only adapting GE’s U.S. products to the Chinese market. It then disrupted the anti-cannibalization paradigm by bringing innovations for the mid-range market in China back to the developed countries like the United States.
Given the growing importance of China as a market, and as an R&D base, Chen had to consider a few important issues in order to maintain the growth of the CTC: what would the role of the CTC be in the long run? How would the CTC continue its role when China was strategically shifting from being the “world’s factory” to a global innovation powerhouse? How could the CTC effectively coordinate with other GE innovation centers in China and with the rest of the GE Global Research network? GE had been moving very quickly, as was China; Chen needed to act accordingly.
GE AND GLOBAL RESEARCH
Headquartered in the U.S. state of Connecticut, GE was formed in 1892 when the Edison Electric Light Company, which was established by incandescent lamp inventor Thomas Edison in 1878, merged with the Thomson-Houston Electric Company. It had been listed on the Dow Jones Industrial Index since 1896.
Jeffrey Immelt, who joined GE in 1982, became GE’s chief executive officer (CEO) in 2000 and chairman of the board in 2001. The company’s businesses covered financial services via GE Capital and the following industrial segments: power and water, energy management, oil and gas, aviation, healthcare, transportation, appliances and lighting. As one of the largest employers in the United States and in the world, it had more than 300,000 employees working in over 100 countries, with over 10,000 employees who worked in China. In 2013, GE had total assets of US$654 billion, of which 50 per cent were based in the United States.1 It generated revenues of $146 billion, net earnings of $13 billion (see Exhibit 1) and 47 per cent of its revenues came from the United States (versus 70 per cent in 2002).
GE had a proven track record of innovation in many scientific disciplines and business areas and had obtained thousands of patents. Its scientists won two Nobel prizes. In 2012, Forbes named GE one of the world’s most innovative companies. In 2013, the company spent $5.4 billion on R&D (see Exhibit 1).
GE Global Research,2 headquartered on a 550-acre3 site in Niskayuna, New York, was one of the world’s largest and most diversified industrial research organizations. It was positioned to be the growth engine of the company by striving to drive technological breakthroughs and working with business units to introduce new technologies into the product pipeline. In addition to fundamental scientific disciplines such as aero- thermal and mechanical systems, chemical engineering, electrical technologies, materials technologies and software sciences and analytics, it focused on innovating in leading-edge areas such as molecular imaging and diagnostics, energy conversion, nanotechnology, advanced propulsion, organic electronics, security and sustainable energy. GE Global Research used about one-tenth of GE’s total R&D expenditure for fundamental research that was not tied to any specific requests made by the business units, while business units split the remaining budget for their own applied research and product development.
GE IN CHINA AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CTC
After starting to trade with China in 1906, GE became the first foreign multinational company (MNC) that conducted manufacturing activities in China. In 1979, the year after the advent of China’s open door policy, GE revived its operations in the country and started to develop its technologies in China.
In 1999, GE Global Research set up its first overseas technology center in Bangalore, India. The main reason for using this location was that Jack Welch, the former CEO and chairman of the board of GE, who had initiated globalization, was very impressed by the low-cost talent there and was attracted to the country’s outsourcing potential. In 1999, China spent 0.76 per cent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on R&D, while India spent 0.71 per cent.4 At that time, even though the Chinese government had encouraged foreign MNCs to set up R&D centers in China, most of these centers did not actively carry out fundamental research due to concerns about the lack of an innovation infrastructure, weak intellectual property protection and the lack of experienced scientists. Siemens founded a small R&D center in Beijing a year earlier, while Philips was planning to set one up in Shanghai the following year.
Chen believed that GE should also set up a technology center in China. He saw the market potential of China and the benefits of having a local technology center, such as the opportunity to cooperate with local government, universities and research institutes. He gained support from several pro-China colleagues, including the head of GE China, and then volunteered to perform the due diligence and to investigate the feasibility and benefits of such a center. He talked to many colleagues and went to China to speak with numerous people who ran R&D centers there. With enthusiasm and determination, his task force was able to convince the top management to approve a small investment of $200,000. Chen reflected, “At that time, the focus was on India. But I asked the business units whether they thought the availability of technical talent in China would help them grow. Based on their positive response, I asked the top management to let me try, even with a small budget.”
In 2000, Chen was relocated back to Shanghai to establish the CTC in order to conduct technology research, develop new products and support manufacturing and sourcing. As the most cosmopolitan city in China, Shanghai had the highest number of foreign R&D labs in the country and also had a relatively good talent pool. The CTC rented space in Caohejing Hi-Tech Park. Building a capable local team was challenging for Chen, and initially, he was given a team of only 10 people. According to a McKinsey report:5
China has 1.6 million young ones, more than any other country we examined. Indeed, 33 per cent of the university students in China study engineering, compared with 20 percent in Germany and just 4 per cent in India. But the main drawback of Chinese applicants for engineering jobs, our interviewees said, is the educational system’s bias toward theory. Compared with engineering graduates in Europe and North America, who work in teams to achieve practical solutions, Chinese students get little practical experience in projects or teamwork. The result of these differences is that China’s pool of young engineers considered suitable for work in multinationals is just 160,000 [people] — no larger than the United Kingdom’s. Hence the paradox of shortages amidst plenty.
Chen realized that, although China had a large supply of technical talent, most of these individuals lacked global communications skills. Thus, Chen had to relocate a few experienced colleagues from the GE Global Research headquarters and hire Chinese returnees. He also had to train new local recruits, who were either engineers from related industries or fresh graduates, by assigning them to international project teams.
At the initial stage, the priority for the CTC was to solve the specific local technology problems and support local businesses to develop products and suppliers. In 2001, Immelt, who was the CEO of GE Healthcare and who had successfully developed business in China, became GE’s chairman of the board. He aimed to develop multiple businesses in China. In support of the development of the CTC, Immelt invested in building facilities for the CTC. In late 2002, Michael Idelchik, who joined GE in 1978, took the role of managing director of the CTC. A few months later, Chen also moved to GE Healthcare China in Beijing to focus on developing new products for this business unit. In May 2003, the CTC’s own facility, a 47,000 square meter (m2) premises at Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park in Pudong, was inaugurated.6 In 2004, Idelchik left, and Bijan Dorri, who joined GE Global Research in 1983, took over.
At the CTC, each R&D employee needed to report to multiple leaders: the head of the CTC, the global technology leader, who coordinated various laboratories for that technology and the leader of a special project that involved product development staff working in a business unit. In addition, scientists and engineers from the headquarters would come to the CTC on assignments to collaborate with the CTC. Their contribution was not immediate, however, because they needed to first understand the differences between the environments in the United States and China — such as the workflow in hospitals. Chen stated:
It’s only when you know the value-creation process well, [that] you can localize by changing the design and qualifying the supplier, etc. For example, the difference between wind speed in the [United States], and that in China, has a huge impact on the product design of our wind turbine.