gun control regulations

Thesis: Even though many argue that the U.S. should not enact a stricter gun control regulations, I maintain that they should because it will reduce rate of massacre and fear.

In the Newsweek article “Gun Control in the US,” Tamara Lytle analyzes the perspective of which the Republicans and the Democrats points of view on the gun–control restriction. According to her research, the Republicans and the NRA insist on the Second Amendment as it enables freedom upon the right of self-defense and it lifts away the fear of power by the federal taking advantage of the state. While the Democrats emphasize that stricter action background check should be conducted for gun purchasers as many murderers purchased guns legally, based on Lytle’s findings. While it may be true that the US should enact a stricter gun control regulations, I assert that gun owners are to stop committing crimes as it brings forth high criminal records and awakening more terrorists.

Body Paragraph 1 Topic Sentence: The first reason the U.S. government should adopt basic restrictions on weapons is because of the high rate of man-slaughter in the country. According to the recent data records, it shows that United States has the highest rate of killing innocents in the world record. The country legislators passing the Second Amendment law in order to guarantee personal right and freedom of power by the state from the federal enable many gun owners to have access to guns of which kill they people as they desire. These gun-shooters execute their evil acts in places where guns are not allowed. Additionally, the background checking to have access to gun is very easy for everyone across the country. Every household possesses arms whereas majority do not have conceal places for these weapons. As a result of killing innocent beings, many Americans are afraid to go to public places with a large number of people. Alan Gottlieb, the founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, and the Legislature are to blame.

Body paragraph 2

Reports on mass shooting in public places create nervousness to citizens of U.S. Gun-owners have access to buy weapons of their choice and take decision of executing people as they wish. Majority of guns used in mass shootings were bought legally with little background check which allow the murderers to terrorize people. American elected leaders reject the most basic restrictions on certain weapons, instead they offer prayers for gun victims and also place a higher premium on profit from spread of more powerful firearms. The Editorial Board, the New York Times asserts that Americans who carry weapons of war need to hand them over for the good of their fellow citizens. A Democrat, Gabrielle Giffords who survived being shot eight years ago at a political rally led supporting group to focus on gun control and figure out the solutions to stop mass shootings in the United States. People want more protection from the government in order to be far from faintheartedness.

In conclusion, it is obvious that Republicans and Democrats have different perspective of enabling citizens of U.S. to have a safe society when it is gun control issue. The Legislature need to change the Second Amendment by passing stricter background checks, along with restriction on war weapons by civilians which would put a stop to killing of multiple innocent people. Furthermore, every gun owners in America should turn in all firearms in their custody after it would have been passed by the Legislature as laws which could give majority assurance of peaceful country. Agreement between the two political parties on the need to change the Second Amendment would stop many civilians from using concealed guns of which will reduce crime. It would protect the public from mass shooting, reduce unpleasant emotion that someone is likely to shoot, but only if both parties are prepare to compromise on masses safety.